The Direction of the Curriculum
Knowledge is not the
motivation for learning this course. Peace is. This is the prerequisite
for knowledge only because those who are in conflict are not peaceful,
and peace is the condition of knowledge because it is the condition
of the Kingdom. Knowledge can be restored only when you meet its conditions.
This is not a bargain made by God, Who makes no bargains. It is merely
the result of your misuse of his laws on behalf of an imaginary will
that is not his. Knowledge is his will. If you are opposing his
will, how can you have knowledge? I have told you what knowledge offers
you, but perhaps you do not yet regard this as wholly desirable. If
you did you would not be so ready to throw it away when the ego asks
for your allegiance.
The distractions of the ego may seem to interfere
with your learning, but the ego has no power to distract you unless
you give it the power to do so. The ego's voice is an hallucination.
You cannot expect it to say "I am not real." Yet you are not
asked to dispel your hallucinations alone. You are merely asked to evaluate
them in terms of their results to you. If you do not want them on the
basis of loss of peace, they will be removed from your mind for you.
Every response to the ego is a call to war, and
war does deprive you of peace. Yet in this war there is no opponent.
This is the reinterpretation of reality that you must make to secure
peace, and the only one you need ever make. Those whom you perceive
as opponents are part of your peace, which you are giving up by attacking
them. How can you have what you give up? You share to have, but you
do not give it up yourself. When you give up peace, you are excluding
yourself from it. This is a condition so alien to the Kingdom that you
cannot understand the state that prevails within it.
Your past learning must have taught you the wrong
things, simply because it has not made you happy. On this basis alone
its value should be questioned. If learning aims at change, and that
is always its purpose, are you satisfied with the changes your learning
has brought you? Dissatisfaction with learning outcomes is a sign of
learning failure, since it means that you did not get what you wanted.
The curriculum of the Atonement is the opposite
of the curriculum you have established for yourself, but so is its outcome.
If the outcome of yours has made you unhappy, and if you want a different
one, a change in the curriculum is obviously necessary. The first change
to be introduced is a change in direction. A meaningful curriculum cannot
be inconsistent. If it is planned by two teachers, each believing in
diametrically opposed ideas, it cannot be integrated. If it is carried
out by these two teachers simultaneously, each one merely interferes
with the other. This leads to fluctuation, but not to change. The volatile
have no direction. They cannot choose one because they cannot relinquish
the other, even if it does not exist. Their conflicted curriculum teaches
them that all directions exist, and gives them no rationale for
choice.
The total senselessness of such a curriculum must
be fully recognized before a real change in direction becomes possible.
You cannot learn simultaneously from two teachers who are in total disagreement
about everything. Their joint curriculum presents an impossible learning
task. They are teaching you entirely different things in entirely different
ways, which might be possible except that both are teaching you about
yourself. Your reality is unaffected by both, but if you listen to both,
your mind will be split about what your reality is.